Written by: News 8 Weather Team
First and foremost, we'd like to discuss the aim of this blog. We created the weather blog in hopes of providing the public with a behind-the-scenes, more in-depth look at what our thoughts are about upcoming or occurring weather. We provide insights as to model data, as well as our own "gut" feelings. We've all got some experience and reason for the thoughts we put into our forecasts.
Recent comments have compared our forecasts to other stations, or criticized our accuracy. We aren't competing. Our forecasts are our forecasts, and no one elses. Weather forecasting is and will NEVER be an exact science, therefore you will always see variations from one station (or one meteorologist) to the next. And yes, we will have errors. There, we said it!
With the anonymity of the blog-o-sphere, anyone can post anything at any time about anyone else. We understand that everyone has an opinion and we respect that. We're also very glad you care enough to check this blog out and participate. Just please remember that we are here only for the purpose of expanding upon our thoughts that we could never possibly cover in a 3 minute weathercast, as much as we'd like to. We hope you continue to enjoy, and that you respect us the writers, as well as all of our readers out there. We love the recent increase in participation here, and hope it only continues to grow.
Okay, now to this weekend's lake effect. Potential is definitely there, there's no doubt about it. Nice cyclonic curvature overhead, an 850 mb low to our east, and a favorable wind direction.
I guess what I want to clear up is the size of this event. We'll all get a good dose of snow, that's not the question at hand. It's that we won't see "historic" or "major" snow. The ideal direction for blockbuster lake effect here is northeast as mentioned before. We've had plenty of occasions where good snow results from a northwest wind, and this weekend will probably be one of them. So while you may need the shovel, you won't be needing your next door neighbors 26 hp John Deere snowblower to escape the driveway.
I took a look at the 1000-850 mb average RH, and its decent, but not impressive. In comparison to the lake effect "event" (if you can call it that) of a few days ago, this next go-around will be something much better, as far as moisture characteristics go. Slower winds will be able to grab more moisture, and the temperatures aren't quite as cold, which means that the air has more moisture-holding capability.
Why aren't we posting the when/where/how much yet? It's too early. The models are really fighting over the placement of this low off the northeast coast, and even then, the thing takes a little joyride around the northeast maritimes. The direction of the winds will have a huge bearing on snow location and amounts. We'll keep you posted.
As I finished this, the data for the 18z NAM came in. Two thoughts:
This is for late Friday night. Good northwest flow, which could set us up with an upstream connection to Lake Superior. Several hours of decent lake effect favoring northwest/southwest areas of Rochester. But it moves quickly.
This is late Saturday/early Sunday morning. This could be interpreted two ways. One, a direct north wind could all but kill the lake effect. Plus, its a pretty swift wind, further limiting boundary-layer moisture. Or two, if this shifts even a little bit, BINGO, there's our northeast wind.